<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media outlets lagging in Mobile Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polestar.org/blog/2009/01/media-outlets-lagging-in-mobile-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polestar.org/blog/2009/01/media-outlets-lagging-in-mobile-web/</link>
	<description>A web guy's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:42:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://polestar.org/blog/2009/01/media-outlets-lagging-in-mobile-web/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polestar.org/blog/?p=103#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Yes you&#039;re right.  Please send your comments to companies like WorldNow or FIM.  They&#039;re the ones that have prompted your complaints.  Us measly web producers have no control over these platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you&#8217;re right.  Please send your comments to companies like WorldNow or FIM.  They&#8217;re the ones that have prompted your complaints.  Us measly web producers have no control over these platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy Jones</title>
		<link>http://polestar.org/blog/2009/01/media-outlets-lagging-in-mobile-web/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polestar.org/blog/?p=103#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I hear that commentary quite frequently, that resources are not available to implement technologies, but let&#039;s be brutally honest with ourselves here. When all I have to do to get mobile support for MY website, is download a free plugin and install it on my blog, how many resources do you actually need? 

The problem is not that it cannot be done or that it is difficult. The problem is that resources (in this case, money) are being inappropriately allocated to other things. Most often in corporate environments, and I am given to understand that our local news media outlets are no exception, an exorbitant sum of money is spent on one piece of software that is advertised as your &quot;One stop solution to all of your internet ills&quot; and the fact ends up being that this advertising was smoke and mirrors. But the corporate dingle berries at the top simply cannot abide the idea that they might have made the wrong choice and don&#039;t know as much about technology as the people they pay to implement it. The IT staff is often left trying to make this &quot;enterprise solution&quot; do things that it was never designed to do in the first place and are not paid enough to fix everything that is wrong with these package deals. 

I am positive that that&#039;s what has happened here, and if the community doesn&#039;t speak out, how will we ever change it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear that commentary quite frequently, that resources are not available to implement technologies, but let&#8217;s be brutally honest with ourselves here. When all I have to do to get mobile support for MY website, is download a free plugin and install it on my blog, how many resources do you actually need? </p>
<p>The problem is not that it cannot be done or that it is difficult. The problem is that resources (in this case, money) are being inappropriately allocated to other things. Most often in corporate environments, and I am given to understand that our local news media outlets are no exception, an exorbitant sum of money is spent on one piece of software that is advertised as your &#8220;One stop solution to all of your internet ills&#8221; and the fact ends up being that this advertising was smoke and mirrors. But the corporate dingle berries at the top simply cannot abide the idea that they might have made the wrong choice and don&#8217;t know as much about technology as the people they pay to implement it. The IT staff is often left trying to make this &#8220;enterprise solution&#8221; do things that it was never designed to do in the first place and are not paid enough to fix everything that is wrong with these package deals. </p>
<p>I am positive that that&#8217;s what has happened here, and if the community doesn&#8217;t speak out, how will we ever change it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://polestar.org/blog/2009/01/media-outlets-lagging-in-mobile-web/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polestar.org/blog/?p=103#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Small markets don&#039;t have the human (and more often than not, the technical) resources to do this kind of thing, and therefore will always lag behind larger markets like LA/NY with leading edge technology.

Another discouraging factor for me anyway (since I work in web media), is the lack of firm standards and diverse platforms that the mobile has.

Plus, it&#039;s hard to sell... and when it comes down to it, it&#039;s all about the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small markets don&#8217;t have the human (and more often than not, the technical) resources to do this kind of thing, and therefore will always lag behind larger markets like LA/NY with leading edge technology.</p>
<p>Another discouraging factor for me anyway (since I work in web media), is the lack of firm standards and diverse platforms that the mobile has.</p>
<p>Plus, it&#8217;s hard to sell&#8230; and when it comes down to it, it&#8217;s all about the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

